haskell - Where's the functor in the natural transformation? -


As long as I have an older category of Edward Cemet - Xtra package:

  - | A natural change type between fertility and fertility f: ~ & gt; G = Everyone's an FA - & gt; Ga  

But after reading Stephen Dahl's blog post, I find this:

A natural change in our context is associated with two Haskell Multifunction function is with Factor Instaners F and G Type Signature (Factor F, FencerG) => Fold AAF -> GA which can be written with the following types of options.

  type nat f g = forall a F.A - & gt; For one who had a slap in the face of the attitude of "I am ignoring this" attitude of the person: why is the fact that the deficiency of the factor suddenly falls to a sudden fall is? 

A barrier to a type of option is not allowed in Haskell and for datatype, Disliked in 2010. Instead, the obstacles should be kept on tasks that work on these types of values.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ios - How do I use CFArrayRef in Swift? -

eclipse plugin - Run java code error: Workspace is closed -

c - Error on building source code in VC 6 -